Friday, March 13, 2009

On the Road

Still vacationing.

Caught up on the regular interval of who will TNS the #4, and the always co-joined subject of Joe Kinney.

We have no doubt Kinney closed a #4, but with the history of earlier IM grippers varying wildly in resistance, this #4 could very well have been a 3.5. When it was tested by IM and found to be "full strength" by IM, we ask, how was it tested? Did a #2 closer give it a squeeze and declare it harder than a #3? Was a "redneck" type calibrator used? Or did a former legend just declare it a #4 from long distance?

"Fucking Nut Bags" ;)